Submission guidelines
ACL is a flagship NLP venue; Long Paper slots are extremely competitive. Reviewers focus on task definition, experimental design, sound linguistics or reasoning, and ethics and limitations. In recent years, Limitations has become a hard expectation: missing or shallow treatment reads as non-compliance or carelessness. ACL uses A4 two-column layout and official ACL styles—margins and fonts differ from many US Letter venues; do not reuse CVPR or NeurIPS templates unchanged.
Common rejection reasons include weak baselines, shallow analysis, and unclear differentiation from prior work. Format pitfalls: A4 vs. Letter confusion, mixing 10pt and 11pt, and Chicago Author-Date citations that do not match the .bib file.
Formatting in detail
- Page and layout: A4; two columns; 9 pages maximum for main text; references usually do not count (per that year’s rules).
- Margins: 2.5 cm on all sides.
- Fonts: body Times New Roman 11pt; headings 15pt.
- Required structure: Abstract, Introduction, Limitations, References; methods, experiments, and ethics follow NLP norms and the template.
- Official hub: ACL 2025 for the CFP, style files, and policy updates.
Abstract guidelines
- Length: 200 words maximum.
- Content: task, data, method, main results; for NLP, state language coverage and resource languages when relevant.
- Integrity: avoid overstating cross-lingual generalization; if you only evaluate in English, do not imply broad multilingual validity.
- Consistency: dataset names and metrics must match the paper.
Citations and references
- Style: Chicago Author-Date (author–year), aligned with the official
.bst/ stylesheet. - BibTeX: complete entries (venue, pages, DOI when available); clear arXiv vs. published versions.
- Common mistakes: mixing APA/IEEE; hand-editing the bibliography; long reference lists in two columns without
table*or column breaks where needed.
Frequent formatting mistakes
- Missing or shallow Limitations: only two or three generic sentences.
- Wrong paper or margins: US Letter or margins not 2.5 cm.
- Main text over 9 pages: appendices folded into the main PDF against rules.
- Inconsistent point size: local 10pt to squeeze space.
- Chicago errors: wrong author, year, or page formatting vs. the guide.
How to convert to ACL format with AutoSCI
- Upload your paper — PDF or Word.
- Choose a template — ACL 2025 (Long Paper).
- Export — LaTeX, PDF, or Word.
AutoSCI applies page limits, margins, fonts, and citation style to match ACL expectations.
Writing the Limitations section
Be concrete and testable: data bias, language coverage, metric blind spots, compute cost, societal risks. Avoid “future work will fix this” without substance; prefer “we did not explore X because Y.” If the method fails on certain genres, say so and point to error patterns.
Ethics and responsible NLP
For human subjects, annotation, or generative misuse, follow ACL ethics guidance; user studies and private data need consent and compliance details.
Two-column figures and tables in NLP
Attention maps, syntax trees, and wide tables overflow easily in two columns. Prefer vector graphics; use tabularx or split columns; move long examples to the appendix.
LaTeX and ACL style
Use the official acl style with natbib; build order and .bst follow the README. Do not mix legacy style file names from older years.
Pre-deadline checklist
- A4, two columns, 2.5 cm margins.
- Main text ≤9 pages (long paper).
- Abstract ≤200 words.
- Includes Limitations.
- Chicago Author-Date citations throughout.
- 11pt / 15pt fonts match the template.
Tips for international authors
- English: precise task definitions and terminology; if you use Chinese corpora, describe annotation protocols clearly in English.
- Deadlines: submissions often use AoE (Anywhere on Earth).
- Multilingual work: state train/test languages and data licenses explicitly.
Migrating from other conferences
From US Letter venues, recalculate paper size and margins; switching citations from IEEE/APA to Chicago requires full-document replacement, not partial edits.
Additional FAQ
Q: Can Limitations appear just before the conclusion?A: Follow the official template section order; there is usually a dedicated \section{Limitations}.
A: Same style family; page limits differ—see the short-paper template page.
Experiments and statistics
Report significance tests, bootstraps, and random seeds; for low-resource settings, disclose data sizes.
Workflow with AutoSCI
Finalize content before switching to the ACL template; double-check A4 / 2.5 cm, Chicago, and Limitations.
Reviews and rebuttal
Respond point by point; for limitations critiques, acknowledge and outline future work without defensive replies lacking evidence.
Version notice
The ACL 2025 official style files and CFP are authoritative.
Related work
Cover classics, top-venue papers, and recent preprints; baselines should include strong standard choices.
Resources and reproducibility
Provide code and data links; if not open-sourcing, explain why and give partial reproduction steps.
PDF and fonts
Embed fonts; avoid orphaned lines at the end of two-column pages.
Case studies and linguistic analysis
Ground qualitative examples in quantitative results; avoid cherry-picked sentences.
Anonymity and ARR
If using ACL Rolling Review, follow anonymity and versioning rules for that cycle.
Common pitfalls
- Copying the abstract into Limitations.
- Describing layout in US customary units incorrectly.
- References not sorted or formatted per Chicago.
Team roles
One person owns the .bib Chicago fields; another owns figure widths and font sizes consistently.
Wide tables and equations
Use split for wide equations; use spanning tables carefully to limit whitespace.
Final pass
Search the PDF for author strings (if anonymous), TODO, and unresolved citations.
Writing cadence
Draft Limitations early alongside experiments—avoid tacking on a hollow section at the end.
Relationship to EMNLP
ACL-series style files are often shared; still follow the current year’s guide for each venue.
Print preview
Use A4 actual size in print preview—avoid Letter scaling that skews margins.
Data provenance
For standard benchmarks, state version and split protocol.
Broader impact
Discuss misuse risks, bias, and mitigations in a dedicated subsection or within ethics, as appropriate.
Appendices
Long proofs and extra experiments go to the appendix; cross-reference appendix labels from the main text.
Last hour before submission
Only verification and upload—avoid large structural edits.